top of page

How to Avoid Common Pitfalls When Measuring Risk on a Revolving Credit Product

  • Writer: Brandon Homuth
    Brandon Homuth
  • Jun 16
  • 2 min read

At Ensemblex, we work with lenders across the fintech ecosystem — from startups to scaled portfolios — and we see many people making the same mistakes when measuring risk on revolving credit products. These mistakes lead to bad decisions, mispriced risk, and inaccurate expectations for portfolio performance.


Here are some of the most common pitfalls and how to avoid them.


1. Measuring Risk “Vertically” Instead of Horizontally


Many lenders look at risk in time slices — delinquency rates in Month A, Month B, Month C — but don't follow what happens to the same *customer* or *account* over time. Both views are useful, but measuring risk over time (horizontally) across defined cohorts, segments, or behaviors is the only way to get real control over your risk management.


2. Reporting DQ as % of Credit Line Instead of % of Outstanding Balance


Some lenders (including some big ones, not just startups!) report delinquency as a percent of total line size. Delinquency as a percent of the credit line may look small (especially for higher-line customers), but it dramatically understates risk. Risk should be tied to exposure — the outstanding balance, not the total potential draw. This is especially misleading in portfolios with higher average line sizes or uneven utilization.


3. Not Differentiating Portfolio vs. Segment Risk


Another mistake is measuring “portfolio-level” metrics without understanding where risk is concentrated. For example, if your overall loss rate is 6%, but your highest-utilization quartile is losing money at 14%, you need to know that.


Segment-level measurement allows smarter underwriting, targeted interventions, and better capital planning.


4. Underweighting Utilization as a Driver of Loss


This one’s subtle but essential. For revolving credit products, utilization plays a major role in determining dollar losses. Two customers with the same credit score and same risk profile can produce very different loss amounts depending on how much of their line they use.


Yet many lenders ignore utilization in their credit strategy, assuming it’s just a byproduct of line assignment or customer behavior. It’s not. Utilization is a lever and should be treated as such.


What Should You Do Instead?


While every portfolio is different, good risk measurement starts with three principles:


  1. Track risk longitudinally, not just by month

  2. Measure exposure correctly (based on balance, not line)

  3. Incorporate utilization into your understanding of risk, not as a side metric, but as a driver of loss


We recently helped a lender reframe its measurement framework using these principles. The result? A clear view of loss drivers, smarter pricing decisions, and a measurable improvement in portfolio returns.


Want to talk about how this applies to your business?



Or reach out directly: shawn@ensemblex.com

bottom of page